On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:29:25PM +0200, Slavko wrote: > Dňa Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:00:18 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian > <vagr...@freegeek.org> napísal: > > NBD support on Debian currently requires an experienced administrator > > willing to test and experiment with the non-default configuration. > > and what about using NBD in Ubuntu? I mean, is there difference about > using (and then testing) NBD under Ubuntu (where ltsp-server-standalone > not depends on NFS) and using it under Debian? Maybe this question is > out of this bugreport, but can be interested by other Debian LTSP users.
it is a simple matter of defaults. Ubuntu defaults to NBD, and thus doesn't require NFS, and NFS support requires manual configuration and is less well tested on Ubuntu, simply because it is not the default. Debian defaults to NFS, and NBD is less tested and requires more manual configuration. (interestingly enough, Debian LTSP supports more options for NBD root than Ubuntu) live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
