On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:41 +0100, David Bremner wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:21:30 +0200, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I doubt that this depends on the version of SyncEvolution.
> > 
> > But you can try that yourself. Please add
> >   deb http://downloads.syncevolution.org/apt unstable main
> > to your apt sources and install "syncevolution-evolution". That'll give
> > you 1.0.99.7.
> > 
> 
> This is a good suggestion, but note that you will probably have to
> manually deinstall all of the debian syncevolution packages (at least
> syncevolution and syncevolution-common) because they don't declare
> conflicts with syncevolution-evolution.

The "syncevolution-evolution" package declares a conflict, so this
worked for me.

> About upgrading, the main reason the packages in Debian have not been
> upgraded is that we are in release freeze for squeeze, and this makes
> getting new upstream versions into the archive rather difficult.

What would be easier to get included: another 1.0.x bug fix update
(which I hadn't intend to prepare in favor of releasing 1.1) or 1.1?

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to