On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:41 +0100, David Bremner wrote: > On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:21:30 +0200, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > > I doubt that this depends on the version of SyncEvolution. > > > > But you can try that yourself. Please add > > deb http://downloads.syncevolution.org/apt unstable main > > to your apt sources and install "syncevolution-evolution". That'll give > > you 1.0.99.7. > > > > This is a good suggestion, but note that you will probably have to > manually deinstall all of the debian syncevolution packages (at least > syncevolution and syncevolution-common) because they don't declare > conflicts with syncevolution-evolution.
The "syncevolution-evolution" package declares a conflict, so this worked for me. > About upgrading, the main reason the packages in Debian have not been > upgraded is that we are in release freeze for squeeze, and this makes > getting new upstream versions into the archive rather difficult. What would be easier to get included: another 1.0.x bug fix update (which I hadn't intend to prepare in favor of releasing 1.1) or 1.1? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
