Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package qimageblitz Well, frankly there is nothing release important about this update. Regardless if you unblock this package or not, just close this report and I won't bother you again about this topic. But nevertheless it would be great to have 1:0.0.6-2 in squeeze because: 1) current qimageblitz package in testing is the same as in lenny. Packaging is rather archaic and uses outdated KDE team packaging practises. It would be great if we didn't have to deal with old cruft for the next 2 years. That's the main reason why this new revision has rather many packaging touches all over the place. But there is nothing ground breaking there; 2) despite upstream version bump, upstream changes are really minimal and basically limited to small build system fixes. There are no changes to symbols and 1:0.0.6-2 has symbol file based on 0.0.4 hence 0.0.6 has no effect on shlibs at all; 3) I had the package ready on 2010-07-28 [1]. But I'd waited for almost two months for upstream to officially release the 0.0.6 tarball which I generated based on their VCS tag. Hence the delay; 4) the package has already spent 20 days in unstable [2]. No new problems were reported. unblock qimageblitz/1:0.0.6-2 [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/kde-req/qimageblitz.git [2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qimageblitz.html -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=lt_LT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org