Hi, On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <a...@inittab.org> wrote: > And the maintainer is not really sure about the benefits of this split. > Mainly because it makes no sense to have a 'openvpn' package containing > nothing useful (examples, docs, and the init.d script) and a package with > just the binary (no init.d, no /etc/openvpn/,...).
I can see two reasons to do the split: 1) less space for those installations in 'client' mode; 2) one less script in /etc/init.d -- just for a pure cosmetic view. However, it seems weird to have the /etc/init.d/openvpn script and /usr/bin/openvpn binary in two separate binary packages. But also this comes only from the fact that the 'openvpn' binary operates in both modes: client and server. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
