Le 16/10/2010 23:24, Guillaume Yziquel a écrit : > Package: ocaml > Version: 3.12.0-1~38 > Severity: normal
Does this apply to 3.10.2 as well? > I'm currently having issues with C++ callbacks to OCaml, [...] Could you be more precise? > [...] and digging into > the callbacks.c file, I discovered that OCaml in Debian is not built > with the LOCAL_CALLBACK_BYTECODE macro enabled. Why should it be? > It seems to me that the current situation might be a can of worms and > segfaults, and I'm wondering whether it would not be a good idea to > build OCaml with LOCAL_CALLBACK_BYTECODE enabled. Where did you get that from? Is this LOCAL_CALLBACK_BYTECODE documented somewhere? The only usage I see is in byterun/callback.c, and I don't see why it should matter here (we are just using the standard bytecode interpreter). Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
