One small correction. The violated RFC is 2616 [1] (not 2606) as the original bug reported.
[1] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html
One small correction. The violated RFC is 2616 [1] (not 2606) as the original bug reported.
[1] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html