On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:49:05PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > I have thought about it and I have decided to stay with pdftk in > recommends (since it significantly enhances the functionality and thus > should commonly accompany impressive) and moved ghostscript-x (actually > just ghostscript) into Suggests... that will close this bugreport (if > you don't mind)
I've used impressive, and I don't actually know exactly what it uses pdftk for. Would you consider elaborating on how it "significantly enhances the functionality" in the package description? (I assume impressive only uses pdftk when using the scripting features?) Thanks, Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
