On 11/02/2010 09:20 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 12:27 +0100, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
On 11/02/2010 12:25 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 03:15:22 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 05:36:08PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Err. That was uploaded as part of a new upstream release, which as far
as I can tell doesn't really match the criteria from
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/10/msg00002.html
What's the plan for getting this fixed in squeeze?
Through an upload via testing-proposed-updates.
t-p-u is supposed to be for situations where the package in unstable
can't migrate for some reason, not so you can upload a version you
know /won't be allowed/ to migrate. :-( It's certainly not intended as
a means of circumventing the request we made in the last d-d-a mail (and
earlier ones) to upload squeeze-targeted changes to unstable.
The packages in unstable will never be allowed into testing, as they are
based on a new upstream release. The upload of this package to unstable happened
about the same time when the freeze was announced, it wasn't intentional.
For one thing, (next to) no-one tests packages in t-p-u before they hit
testing.
I don't think this is a real problem in our case.
Regards
Racke
--
LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/
Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration
ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/
Interchange Development Team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
