Now Squeeze is installed into the notepad and I can test the parted
2.3-3 that is available from it. No problem without partition of course,
bt the surprise is that it also have no issue with a FAT12 partition:
fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 5 MB, 5242880 bytes
1 heads, 10 sectors/track, 1024 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 10 * 512 = 5120 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 2 1024 5115 1 FAT12
parted /dev/sdb print
Model: disk2go PURE II (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 5243kB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 5120B 5243kB 5238kB primary
But from http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/libparted0-udeb it seem that
this is this 2.3-3 version that is used into the installer. I feel lost
in doubt. I rebooted and restarted the installer, only to find that his
parted still abort the same way.
Now the question is why the parted from the installer react so bad to
something that do not hurt the parted from squeeze, since there should
be compiled from the same code base ?
Or is there something missing in the picture ?
Jean-Christian de Rivaz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org