On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:16:46PM +0100, Emmanuel wrote: > > I've been building my own kernels since 0.9x versions... and I like > stability.
nice, but irrelevant 0.9 pointer. 2.6.32 is the stable branch. 2.6.30 is long fucked, please wake up. the ide stack is dead, switch to libata or better use images where people take care. > Actually I haven't moved my boots that are still managed by lilo and > didn't get time to upgrade to other bootloaders, so debian kernels are > not possible at the time. lilo has a large mem option where it *can* boot linux-2.6 images, so wrong answer. > I expect I am not the only one having reached this problem recently, > or other will if they go from stable to testing as I did recently on > some package, so it would be interresting if you understand what is > going on rather than rejecting everything so quickly. how about you doing some research, aka proper reporting instead of useless escalation from the start on. one specific udev not working != "cricitical RC bug" and even less on unsupported third party compilations. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
