Hi Ben, Ben Pfaff wrote: > First, I think that we might just end up removing corekeeper entirely,
Hmm, I think it sounds like a useful package. I was thinking about using it on workstations with NFS homes to keep core dumps of several GB away from NFS mounted directories. I also thought about adding it as "Suggests" to my upcoming unburden-home-dir package: http://bugs.debian.org/602045 > because it has little relation to the other packages that are part of > openvswitch. That sounds like a reason not packaging it under the OVS packaging team, but not like a reason for not having it in Debian. :-) > Second, I think that it is likely that all of OVS should be Linux-only, > because the kernel module only supports Linux and OVS isn't too useful > without the kernel module. No idea about OVS. I regarded it as standalone package. I only noticed the OVS team as maintainer, so I knew it was relatedto alle the OVS packages which were in the new packages list that day, too. :-) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
