On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:55:31PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:13:28AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:49:57PM +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Ana Guerrero <a...@debian.org> writes: > > > >> Long time ago I read about adept being discontinued [0]. However, a new > > > >> version was uploaded a couple of weeks ago with 2 big problems, > > > >> it FTBFS (#540648) and it lacks of a real maintainer now , specially > > > >> since > > > >> the used list is moderated (#540229). Due to this, the package has > > > >> been > > > >> removed today from testing. > > > >> I was wondering what are the future plans for adept, specially with > > > >> respect > > > >> its status for releasing it in Squeeze. > > > > > Yes, Adept is currently discontinued as far as development goes. But > > > Enrico > > > needed to change something about libept which is required to build adept, > > > so I > > > tried to kick the package into some shape. Due to limited time and broken > > > pbuilder, it took a little longer than I'd like, but all RC issues should > > > be > > > fixed again now. > > > > > > Otherwise, when I have time, I'll fix bugs and maybe even add a feature > > > here > > > and there. Don't count on anything though, I may disappear without further > > > notice again. > > > > > > > Thanks for the answer Petr, if you do not mind, i will leave the bug open as > > possible indicator that we might have to remove it for testing when freezing > > Squeeze. ok? > > > Should adept be removed from testing now? Shipping it in stable does not make > much sense, right?
FWIW, adept seems to work fine. However, the part about not being longer maintained (it has been beta for more than a year now) and the last upload being a NMU, make me wonder too what we should do. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
