Hi Harald, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> What I meant was that the "unstable" version is a little bit too > "experimental" for me. Recovery from a broken grub2 upgrade can be > _pretty_ difficult. This means there is a high risk for doing > grub2 upgrades, even if the code itself is very stable. > > IMHO the high risk should be reduced by better testing in the > "experimental" branch, before a new version is promoted to > "unstable". How do you feel about this today? Probably for your needs pinning grub to "testing" might be a little better, but regardless, I've found the level of scary much lower lately. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
