clone 509702 -1 reassign -1 fenix found -1 0.92a.dfsg1-5 retitle -1 fenix: Needs a sourceful upload to get correct Architecture in .dsc retitle 509702 fenix-plugins: Architecture fields out of sync with fenix thanks
On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 01:57:59 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > reassign 509702 fenix-plugins > found 509702 0.0.20070803-3 > thanks > > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 01:52:23AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > Package: fenix > > Version: 0.92a.dfsg1-5 > > Severity: normal > > > > fenix currently lists the architectures for which it should be built in > > the binary stanza of `debian/control'. This is wrong. Instead they > > should be moved to the source stanza so that builds fail immediately. Ok, this applies to fenix, and was due to a bug in dpkg-dev fixed long time ago, a simple sourceful upload will fix this automatically as the .dsc will get generated anew. > > Apart from that: is there a reason why not all !64bit architectures > > are listed? E.g. powerpc is missing from both fenix and fenix-plugins. > > There are also other architectures like sparc which have 32bit > > userspace. (Not exactly sure about s390, but probably it does not > > have the weird 31bit one.) > > > > I not-for-us'ed both packages on alpha, ia64 and amd64. > > Oops, obviously it's already too late on this Christmas eve. It looks > like only the first of a folded line was copied to fenix-plugins' control > file. Thus reassigning and fenix-plugins' line is incomplete. And this applies to fenix-plugins, and needs to get the Architecture fields in debian/control synced with the ones from fenix. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org