On 2010-11-26 13:31 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Am 26.11.2010 12:44, schrieb Rolf Leggewie: > >>> I've prepared an NMU for isdnutils (versioned as 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1) >>> and >>> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7.dsc >> is what I would like to see uploaded instead. Alexander, please >> supersede or remove the NMU. Thank you. > > On it's way. > > However, I'm not really convinced, that my solution is wrong. > /sbin/MAKEDEV calls where removed on purpouse on 1:3.9.20060704-5, most > likely due to the lintian warning because of Policy 6.1 last paragraph.
IIRC the udev maintainer has committed to always ensure that /dev/MAKEDEV is available. And it does not really make sense to run /sbin/MAKEDEV when /dev is under udev's control. > To my understanding the ./MAKEDEV would also not satisfy that should > clause, but at least lintian doesn't detect it and you don't need an to > override it's warning ;) > > However, you are the maintainer, so I sponsored the version on mentors. This version has the rather serious flaw that the capiutils postinst still checks for /dev/MAKEDEV rather than /sbin/MAKEDEV which it actually tries to run. :-( Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
