On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > I'd be interested to know if anyone has a recommendation on how to > handle this. The two packages in question are -dbg packages that are > created by dh_strip, excerpted from debian/rules below: > > dh_strip -s -psasl2-bin -plibsasl2-2 -plibsasl2-modules > -plibsasl2-modules-ldap -plibsasl2-modules-otp -plibsasl2-modules-sql > -plibsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit -plibsasl2-dev > -Nlibsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal --dbg-package=cyrus-sasl2-dbg > dh_strip -s -plibsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal -Nsasl2-bin -Nlibsasl2-2 > -Nlibsasl2-modules -Nlibsasl2-modules-ldap -Nlibsasl2-modules-otp > -Nlibsasl2-modules-sql -Nlibsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit -Nlibsasl2-dev > --dbg-package=cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg > > Both packages need to be able to be installed together, so my question > centers around whehter it is OK to put a diversion in place so that > cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg diverts the file. What does everyone think? > So, it appears that there are some other possibilities, thanks to a posting by Luca Capello [0]. The first possibility is trivial, but is not as "correct." The second is more "correct" but a larger diff. Given that this must go into Lenny, what opinion or preference does the release team have on the matter?
Regards, -Roberto [0] http://bugs.debian.org/610977 -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
