On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 15:25 -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > > > #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not > > > accept such dependency lines. > > > > > dpkg has _never_ had support for arch-specific Depend lines, just > > Build-Depend. That bug should not have been closed. > > This is correct, _dpkg_ has never had support. > > However, dpkg-dev/dpkg-gencontrol did have support at one time(or the support > is there but broken), and the arch-specific depends lines are fixed up when > generating debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control. > Then it was broken from release; I went back and checked the release that was in and it doesn't work -- because although the support is in the code, the crucial ", 1)" is missing from the call to the function that does it.
Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
