Hi all

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 09:44:53PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 23:01 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> > On 12/01/2010 10:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > 0012-moving-http_client_body-logic-to-use-it-per-transact.patch is
> > > mentioned neither in debian/patches/series, nor the changelog; was it
> > > intended to be included in the package, or is it simply cruft which
> > > {sh,c}ould be ignored when reviewing the diff?
> [...]
> > Good catch: this patch was a candidate for inclusion, but was not
> > included because it is not a bugfix (and cause a conflict). I forgot to
> > remove it from disk (and it is pretty big: 57k) so it should be ignored
> > for the review. If you think the size is a problem, just tell me I'll
> > resend a package without this patch.
> 
> I've just approved suricata 1.0.1-1squeeze1; it's just waiting for the
> s390 build to be uploaded before it can move to testing.

Just going trough the open RC bugs for squeeze. #598389 could now be
marked too as fixed in the version in squeeze, as now the s390 build
is too uploaded.

Bests
Salvatore

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to