Hi fulvio, thanks for your bug report. On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 19:59, fulvio ciriaco <oiv...@gmail.com> wrote: > The following excerpt of conversation with reportbug should explain > the point > 0% reportbug > Please enter the name of the package in which you have found a problem, or > type 'other' to > report a more general problem. >> linux-image > linux-image package has been removed, use linux-2.6 instead (replaced here > automatically). > *** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. *** > Detected character set: UTF-8 > Please change your locale if this is incorrect. > > Using 'fulvio ciriaco <oiv...@gmail.com>' as your from address. > Getting status for linux-2.6... > No matching source or binary packages. > A package named "linux-2.6" does not appear to be installed; do you want to > search for a > similar-looking filename in an installed package [Y|n|q|?]? n
What's happening here is: - 'linux-image' is automatically converted to 'linux-2.6' - 'linux-2.6' is searched in the binary packages list, but not found - then the source packages list is searched (and 'linux-2.6' would have been found there) but there's no Sources file on your machine (no deb-src in /etc/apt/sources.list) - the search fails, as shown above. I'm still wondering what to do in the case of linux-2.6, maybe I'll have to "whitelist" it somehow, or just leave things as they are and document it, let's wait a bit and see how it goes :) Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org