Hello, thank you for looking at the patch.
On 05-Aug-26 13:58, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:13:36 +0900, > GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > * debian/control.in/powerpc: New libc6-(dev-)powerpc packages for > > > ppc64. > > > > This name "powerpc" is confusable with the current powerpc - could I > > rename it from powerpc to ppc32? Yes, please do that. The name 'ppc32' will make things clearer. > Note that ppc32 things is just for debian/control.in/ppc32. > libc6-powerpc is OK for me. Instead of 'libc6-powerpc' and 'libc6-dev-powerpc' one could perhaps also use use the names 'lib32c6' and 'lib32c6-dev' for the 32-bit alternative packages. This would be consistent with the naming of the 'lib32gcc1' and 'lib32stdc++6' packages from gcc-4.0. The same name lib32c6(-dev) could later also be used for 32-bit libc6 packages on amd64. However, the name 'libc6(-dev)-powerpc' is easier to implement because it follows the current naming scheme for alternative libc6 packages and can therefore use the already existing infrastructure for packaging. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]