Package: xresprobe Version: 0.4.23debian1 Here is the patch for my NMU of xresprobe.
diff -u xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/debian/changelog xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/debian/changelog --- xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/debian/changelog +++ xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +xresprobe (0.4.23debian1-0.2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload to fix RC bug. + * Fix typo 'to to' in package description. + * Apply patch from Ubuntu: + - Fix build problem with recent kernels by defining *_MASK in + ddcprobe/lrmi.c (Closes: #608187). Patch from Chris Coulson. + + -- Petter Reinholdtsen <p...@hungry.com> Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:56:48 +0100 + xresprobe (0.4.23debian1-0.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload with maintainer approval. diff -u xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/debian/control xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/debian/control --- xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/debian/control +++ xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/debian/control @@ -23 +23 @@ - are, however, sufficiently generic to to be useful to other architectures. + are, however, sufficiently generic to be useful to other architectures. only in patch2: unchanged: --- xresprobe-0.4.23debian1.orig/ddcprobe/lrmi.c +++ xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/ddcprobe/lrmi.c @@ -54,6 +54,13 @@ #include "include/lrmi.h" #include "x86-common.h" +#if defined(__linux__) && !defined(TF_MASK) + #define TF_MASK X86_EFLAGS_TF + #define IF_MASK X86_EFLAGS_IF + #define VIF_MASK X86_EFLAGS_VIF + #define IOPL_MASK X86_EFLAGS_IOPL +#endif + #if defined(__linux__) #define DEFAULT_VM86_FLAGS (IF_MASK | IOPL_MASK) #elif defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__FreeBSD__) Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
