retitle 599290 consider using apt-cache instead of dpkg --status severity 599290 wishlist thanks
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 14:10, Michal Čihař <ni...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi > > Dne Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:05:19 +0100 > Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> napsal(a): > >> mh, you can probably looking at what's teh status of >> /var/lib/dpkg/available and /var/lib/dpkg/status in regards to >> nanoblogger-extra, maybe also the Packages file of apt, but it >> shouldn't matter in this case. > > It's not listed in neither dpkg databases, so dpkg is right. I have no > idea how these databases should be udpated from apt, but the problem > seems to be in this. > >> Anyhow, I'm less inclined to consider this report as a bug in >> reportbug, but let's see how deep we go :) > > Indeed, at most it is wishlist to use apt cache, but feel free to close. Converted in a wishlist bug, let's see in some time :) Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org