Hello, I guess I can avoid a new bugreport since this one matches somehow...
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 05:17:05PM +0100, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 29.12.2010, 12:57 +0100 schrieb Miros??aw Zalewski: > > There is brand new 05_debian_theme in newest grub-pc. Unfortunetly, it > > does not allow user to have no background splash image at all, unless > Yep, that's true. I'm currently thinking how the user could specify that > he doesn't want a background image at all. Would it be ok, if you had to > put a line like this into /etc/default/grub: > GRUB_BACKGROUND="" IMHO, 05_debian_theme should simply do nothing if GRUB_BACKGROUND is set (empty or not), because this one is for and handled by 00_header already (not as sophisticated as 05_debian_theme does it, but ... well...). Btw: testing for an empty but set environment variable is not that easy... :) 'if env | grep -q ^GRUB_BACKGROUND=; then ...' comes to my mind... IMHO, the same applies for the case where 05_debian_theme chooses the lexically first image in /boot/grub - just don't do it: if the user copied one there, he had to configure it somewhere anyways. Furthermore, the default colors set by 05_debian_theme for the three alternatives to grub_background.sh: GRUB_BACKGROUND, the lexically first image in /boot/grub, and for desktop-grub.png if no grub_background.sh exists are simply ... well, useless: black/black - hmmm :) Btw2: I guess, #581049 could be closed now where 05_debian_theme deals with the desktop-grub alternative. thanks for your work & regards Mario -- You know, people think mathematics is complicated. Mathematics is the simple bit. Its the stuff we can understand. Its cats that are complicated. I mean, what is it in those little molecules and stuff that make one cat behave differently than another, or that make a cat? And how do you define a cat? I have no idea. -- John Conway
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature