On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 09:23:42PM +0100, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > As explained earlier I don't see any way to distinguish between the case > where you put the file under /boot/grub/ and the case where GRUB's > postinst did that. To 05_debian_theme both cases look the same. > > The only real solution to your problem is to simply remove the offending > code completely. I plan to do that, but only after squeeze's release. > meanwhile you can simply use a different name for the picture. > > So, after all this is more of a political decision than a technical one. > I therefore believe that the package maintainer should decide what's > the correct thing to do. However, I guess he's agreeing with my decision > since he initially accepted that code.
I'm OK with your approach outlined in this and your subsequent comment on this bug. I think the situation is slightly unfortunate, but on the whole you seem to have made the best of a bad job and it's indeed a candidate for cleanup after squeeze. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
