On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:17 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Hello, > > On trečiadienis 05 Sausis 2011 00:09:21 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 20:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > On 2010-12-29 00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > >> On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > > > >> > So best option for now seems be to prevent > > > >> > freebsd-utils 8.1-3 from entering testing and a new upload of > > > >> > kfreebsd-8. > > > >> > > > >> For the record, freebsd-utils 8.1-3 will migrate in three days if not > > > >> hindered.
Hmmm, in fact it looks like someone else unblocked it, so it's migrated anyway. > > > I have added the proposed patch for the cons25-debian terminfo entry to > > > ncurses git¹. Once this is in unstable, the kFreeBSD people may choose > > > to implement any of the suggested solutions. > > > > That's now happened; thanks. Is the ncurses change suitable for > > migration in its own right, or does it need an associated change on the > > kFreeBSD side still? > > Huh, looks like kfreebsd kernel change was reverted [1]. > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/e1pa9a9-00028v...@franck.debian.org Indeed. I'm now thoroughly confused. :-) As the freebsd-utils change has hit testing after all, is unblocking ncurses to go with it sufficient, or do we need further changes? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org