On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:01:23PM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Just a follow-up...I've found the upstream source for dbus-c++ (turns out I > missed its git archive), and I've successfully packaged it. Note that it's > NOT lintian clean at the moment. I have no idea about manpages because I > don't know what the binaries in dbus-c++-dev do, and the previous maintainer > didn't bother including man pages either, so I'm stuck. >
s/packaged/updated packaging/ :) When you say you have packaged something it means you have done from scratch. > https://github.com/Vincent-C/dbus-cplusplus > > Lintian output is in the README attached to that github repo. It's packaged > with a QA upload in mind. > > Mr. Filoni, you would also have to adopt dbus-c++ and dbus-c++-dev if you > still want to adopt Gnote. If you would still like to do so, please feel > free to use my work; otherwise, I would just be as willing to adopt both > gnote and these dbus packages. :) Ok, so what about the following plan: - QA uploads of tnome and dbus-c++ to update it to the latest version (as some users asked) - Then work with usptream and maintainer from other distros in getting the next version of gnote using a different D-Bus implementation. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org