Hi, On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:22:14AM +0800, mirror wrote: > Hi, Simon: > As follow the document, We done all we need.
Do you have any problem using the recommended ftpsync ? Using a custom (and possibly broken) script lead to a mirror not usable during updates. Please consider using the advised script, or double-check every rsync requirement listed at http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror#how > We request to be add into mirror list. As asked in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589525#10, we'd like to know the bandwidth available. > Site: mirrors.163.com > Packages archive, over HTTP: /debian/ > Backports packages, over HTTP: /debian-backports/ > Supports IPv6: no > > Main mirror is updated from: ftp.tw.debian.org > Backports mirror is updated from: ftp.tw.debian.org > CD/DVD image mirror is updated from: ftp.se.debian.org > > Frequency of mirroring: push-triggered Ack (according to timestamps) > Mirrored architectures: source amd64 i386 > Name of site maintainer: netease > Public e-mail of site maintainer: mir...@service.netease.com > Country of site: CN China > Location of site: Hangzhou > Name of site sponsor: Netease > URL of site sponsor: http://www.163.com > > On 01/09/2011 03:12 AM, Simon Paillard wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 08:18:10PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > >> Is there any update on making this mirror in the list? > > > > Read our comments waiting for a reply since Sept 2010: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589525#10 -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
