On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 02:17:14PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > In this example I used IPv4->IPv4 since it's more likely to be installed
> > on armel[1] boxes, but the bug happens if the listen address is IPv6 as
> > well:
> >
> > [~]$ 6tunnel -4 -l ::1 5432 10.2.10.2 5432
> > 6tunnel: unable to resolve host 10.2.10.2
>
> The correct usage in this case is "6tunnel -6" (local v6, remote v4)
> which should work.
Then why exactly does an option about listener break resolving the target?
Also, it appears all resolving is broken in this case, not just numeric
literals.
--
1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
// Never attribute to stupidity what can be
// adequately explained by malice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
