> Can I ask you to take a look at the attached patch? It is not yet > satisfactory (at least, it needs to be forwardported to the CVS > version, as I worked against 5.2.1 because I wanted to install this > ASAP on my Debian boxen), but maybe we can start from this to discuss > what needs to be done. It implements sha224, sha256, sha384 and > sha512.
Would it make more sense to have a single sha utility that takes an argument of which algorithm to use, defaulting to the most secure, then the user can define wrappers to invoke a non-default algorithm? For example, 'sha --algorithm=sha224' or 'sha --224'? -- Eric Blake -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
