On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I might consider uploading to unstable the proposed version (+Debhelper 7)
> > in any case. This is suboptimal for unstable because R version is higher
> > there but I might check in my unstable chroot if it at least passes the
> > library(happy) check. This enables us to be fast once Steffen gives better
> > explanation and is a good and reasonable update of packaging for unstable
> > anyway.
> >
> Well, the debhelper bump is definitely a no-no for squeeze.
Ups, that's a bit late for the just uploaded package. However it seems
that bug #611008 was a false alarm. I'm waiting for confirmation of the
reporter.
Just for the sake of interest: The no-no for the Debhelper 5 to 7 bump
is only because you consider the *change* with potential consequences as
to heavy for last minute Squeeze inclusion or is there something else
which makes it a no-no?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
