2011/1/27 Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org>:
>
> I just took a look at the original bug report and fixed some of the
> issues.
Great, thanks!
I agree that points 1-4 and 7 can be considered fixed. That leaves 5,
6, 8, 9 and 10.
> 5,6) Still needs to be changed. Maybe move to it's own section about
> access control.
I think this section should be moved to at.allow(5). I will submit a
patch against git separately. I don't think there's any conflict
between specifying that an empty /etc/at.deny is the default, while
shipping a non-empty one on Debian, but arguably it's simpler just to
remove the bit about the default, as any user will need to check
whether /etc/at.{deny,allow} exist on their system in any case.
The first part of point 6 is already addressed by the existing
documentation, but it will be clearer when moved to at.allow(5).
The documentation clearly states that output is mailed, optionally
using the command MAIL_CMD, which answers the second part of point 6,
about syslog: at cannot normally use syslog, but you could fake up a
MAIL_CMD which logged the output instead of mailing it. I don't think
this needs spelling out in the man page.
Point 10 will be addressed by moving the full documentation on
at.allow to at.allow(5).
> 8,9) Still needs to be changed. timespec is not user-friendly either :/
Point 8 can be addressed by simply deleting the word "exact" from
at(1) :) I'll include this in my patch.
Point 9 I will address in a separate patch.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
