On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of course, we want udev 0.060 and linux-2.6 to be available at the same > > time in each suite, because dealing with the udev preinst failure is > > still disruptive -- we want users to install the kernel update *first*. > I don't understand this, if having the wrong udev for your kernel is only > minorly disruptiuve, why this anoying preinst rule ? I mean, i have tried to Because the opposite is not true, and recent udev versions do not work with old kernels.
> It would also be nice for Marco to be a bit more cooperative next time such > situation arise. I think I have been very cooperative, but I'm not going to be the scapegoat of people who did not bother investigating how udev works. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
