On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:14:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > In summary, I think that test-1 could be considered OK, unless we > > > > manage to find a way to further enhance the result... > > > > > > This was long overdue, but the graphs are now officially on > > > qa.debian.org, > > > > Cool! Thanks! > > > > > I also modified the rrdtool graph command so that missing data don't > > > leave white stripes on the graphs (though I wonder if that has an impact > > > on packages that no bugs now but had some a few months ago) > > > > Mmmmh, it seems it has an impact: see for instance > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/libd/libdata-dump-streamer-perl.html > > which has no bugs currently, but the graph still reports 1 pending bug: > > http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/libd/libdata-dump-streamer-perl.png > > I tried to find one such package but failed. I'll take a look.
I think I fixed it. The graph you pointed is refreshed, the others will be refreshed by the cronjob in a few hours. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
