On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 14:59 -0600, David R. Hedges wrote: > UFRaw 0.18 was released upstream earlier this week[1]. I've become > interested in this issue because gimp-ufraw is nearly useless for my > Canon PowerShot S95, for which support is added in the 0.18 release (via > dcraw.c revision 1.440 [2]). > > Is there still potential for progress on this bug to upgrade to the > latest upstream version, or should I open a new bug to update to version > 0.18, or a new bug to specifically address the S95 incompatibility with > the version in Debian (with the tag fixed-upstream)? > > If this bug is sufficient to address my issue as well, I request that it > be upgraded to severity: important, because it produces badly flawed > output for some users in its current state.
Yes, now that squeeze is officially released, and we're allowed to upload to sid again, I'm planning updating ufraw to the latest version. -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
