tag 615848 + wontfix thanks On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Of course, there are situations when limiting the number of processors > is desirable (eg. to leave some processors for other tasks or to build > broken packages which don't build in parallel) and for this the -j<n> > option can be used. > > I am asking here only for a default <n> that makes more sense.
I'm sorry this won't be done. Not all packages can safely be built with -j and we don't want to change a default to something that will break an unknown number of packages. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
