Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 19:16 +0000 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > No. Your system was messed up since you didn't have a symlink there (as you > should). I'm tempted to close this bug.
I don't know why *I* had a directory instead of a symbolic link, but I can think of at least one not very unlikely way: Imagine you install pango 1.28.3-4, then go back to an earlier version and re-upgrade some time later: You would be screwed. Since there is absolutely no downside in checking ones assumptions (i.e. /usr/share/doc/libpango1.0-0 being a symlink), I think you should re-consider applying the patch. However, it's your decision; feel free to close the bug if you want to. Best regards Alexander Kurtz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
