On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:53:09PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > severity 618603 minor > tag 618603 + wontfix > thanks > > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:00:26PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > I have just upgraded to libreoffice from Ooo. Now, every time I start > > libreoffice in a new Gnome session, I get the error message: > > > > Error loading BASIC of document > > file:///home/jdg/.libreoffice/3/user/basic/script.xlc/: > > General Error. > > General input/output error. > > > > I have no idea what this error is about or where it originates; I do > > not have such a directoryi[...] > > You *do* have a .libreoffice/3. At latest after the first start. > Otherwise LibreOffice wouldn't have any (user) config.
Correct. But the document (.../script.xlc/) appears from the message to be a directory (note the trailing slash); it turns out from your directory listing that this is misleading and it is actually a file. > > , and an rgrep for script.xlc in ~/.[a-z] turned up nothing, [...] > > rene@frodo:~/.libreoffice/3/user/basic$ ls -l > insgesamt 12 > -rw-r--r-- 1 rene rene 406 15. Mär 23:46 dialog.xlc > -rw-r--r-- 1 rene rene 406 15. Mär 23:46 script.xlc > drwxr-xr-x 2 rene rene 4096 18. Jan 20:41 Standard However, I have: polya:~/.libreoffice/3/user/basic $ ls -l total 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 jdg jdg 406 Feb 3 20:49 dialog.xlc drwxr-xr-x 2 jdg jdg 4096 Mar 16 14:48 Standard/ > > so I have no clue why it is trying to look for a script in this location. > > You have no clue why LibO is looking inside its user config? To be more precise: I have no idea why LibO is looking for the file "~/.libreoffice/3/user/basic/script.xlc" when I (a) do not have such a file, and (b) there is no reference to such a file anywhere in the LibO user configuration. > Anyway, this is a upgrade bug when LibO finds a OOo 1.1.x or so config > still around.... No, I don't have any OOo 1.1.x configuration anywhere. I did, however, have a file called ~/.openoffice.org/3/user/basic/script.xlc prior to the upgrade, but that now no longer exists on the machine from which I reported the bug. However, on a second machine which I also upgraded today, both the .openoffice.org and .libreoffice versions of script.xlc exist. It seems that something a bit weird has happened during the upgrade process, therefore. You might wish to reconsider the severity and tags of this bug in the light of this further information. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
