On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 15:27 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > 2011/3/16 Bin Guo <gb2...@comcast.net>: > > On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 18:35 +0100, Volker Behr wrote: > >> Just as a hint from upstream: you might want to have a look > >> at /var/log/cups/cups-pdf_log with LogType set to 7 > >> in /etc/cups/cups-pdf.conf. > >> I myself have no current Debian available for testing at the moment. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Volker > > > > This is frustrating: while downgraded cups-pdf works, I have > > another debian system that works fine. No idea what changed, > > but on my laptop definitely only 2.5.0-16 works. > > > > Logs: > > cups-pdf_log-2.5.0-16-good (downgraded and working on my laptop) > > cups-pdf_log-2.5.1-1-empty (upgraded but empty on my laptop) > > cups-pdf_log-2.5.1-1-good (upgraded but working on another debian) > > This is confusing, because the exact same 2.5.1-1 somehow works on > another one of your hosts. I wonder why. > > Volker: can you spot anything in those logs that I might have missed? > > Martin-Éric
Comparing the logs for the two installations of 2.5.1 it seems the files printed in either case are not identical and/or not printed the same way, so it is hard to discern what differences in the log are due to what differences in the setup (e.g., in one case, there is a PS title found, in the other it is not). It would be good to have the log for one empty PDF and one good PDF using 2.5.1 (and, of course, identical versions of CUPS and GhostScipt - chack that in any case!), both using identical cups-pdf.conf-settings, identical PPDs, identical printing commands and identical input files. Regards, Volker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
