On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 11:43 -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit : > > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:34 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 11:22 -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit : > > > > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 12:09 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > > > On 2011/3/21 Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 07:01 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > >> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 16:21 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > >> > I can build and upload on Monday, but I'm afraid I don't have > > > > > >> > time until > > > > > >> > then. Sylvestre, if you can do it before Monday, then feel free > > > > > >> > to go > > > > > >> > ahead. Otherwise I will post to the bug again when I start to > > > > > >> > build. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Just finished the build and am about to dupload. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> The finished package will be at > > > > > >> http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/opencascade/ > > > > > >> (along with a bunch of old versions). > > > > > > > > > > > > D'oh! Forgot to change from UNRELEASED to unstable. Building > > > > > > again... > > > > > > > > > > Please upload to experimental. AFAICT one has to ask debian-release > > > > > before uploading a new library, can someone confirm? > > > > > > > > I haven't heard this, and don't remember seeing anything in d-d-a on > > > > this. The NEW queue has, in the past day, entries for libav and > > > > libboost with new library versions in unstable, and libunique3 and hdf5 > > > > with new library versions in experimental (hdf5 changed by Sylvestre). > > > Well, about hdf5, I contacted the release team but haven't heard back. > > > Anyway, experimental is for such things... > > > > Really? When was the announcement? In the past, I've always uploaded > > new libraries into unstable, and they entered when they've passed > > through the NEW queue... > To me, when the binary compatibility of a library changes, you are supposed > to apply the > following procedure: > > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#binarycompat
Thanks, I hadn't seen that document. I don't see anything there on unstable vs. experimental though. [Also my last post only mentioned freecad, netgen and elmerfem; I didn't note that gmsh and salome are also reverse-depends of opencascade.] > > I don't see a post from you in the debian-release archives from this > > year (2011). When did you contact them? > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00503.html Oh, my mistake. (I only looked at the first page of each month.) I notice that there weren't any followups. I have to say I am glad you are working with hdf5 -- that team was the slowest I have ever seen to process new patches etc.! > I uploaded to experimental to make sure it build correctly (which is not > the case here). After this is fixed, I will have to upload to unstable > and report bugs to the reverse dependencies of hdf5 asking them to > update the dependencies... I see, so you're using experimental to test building. As you said I don't think that's an issue here, so I think I can upload it to unstable, haven't heard anything to convince me otherwise... The updated packages are at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/opencascade/ -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
