On 26/03/2011 18:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I would suggest you to give a look at this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619472
That is the very same bug report you are responding to. Probably not
what you meant to refer to.
Sorry for the error, i was referring to:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619022
It's a bug opened by me, in which there is a link to a bug i opened
upstream, where there are informations that have lead me to reply here.
But you have a rather new i945, so this can be unrelated.
Yes, different chips have different problems.
Yes, although to me they look suspiciously similar.
Please don't reply to bugs unless you are a maintainer or have real
information to add.
I'm sorry that you think that my reply contains no info and it's
useless. My intention was the opposite: to help Debian and the submitter
to solve the bug and, indeed, i believed my reply could be useful to
this. And, i assure you, my time is as precious as yours, and it's not
my intention to waste neither your nor mine nor everyone's else.
Ciao.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
