On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:13, Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:33:17AM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote: >> I think this is very similar to --secrect-keyring which isn't really needed, >> but gpg seems to insist on having it around… > > --trustdb-name /dev/null seems to work just fine, as does > --secret-keyring /dev/null.
It works as long as the keyring isn't changed, but if a key is added or remove you will get the lovely message: gpg: fatal: /dev/null: invalid trustdb secmem usage: 1408/1408 bytes in 2/2 blocks of pool 1408/32768 The action is executed non the less, but gpg exits with non-zero status and i don't think ignoring gpg failures is a good idea… Best regards David Kalnischkies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
