So, I've recently been informed that *is* actually valid XHTML. The wonderful amount of misleading information about being invalid XHTML, or Firefox not supporting is due to a bizarre browser bug that apparently causes Firefox to reject in XHTML under certain circumstances. The same browser bug hit me.
However, I did just run awstats output though W3C's XHTML validator, and there are still large numbers of validation errors, just the thing isn't one of them. Francis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
