On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Carsten Hey wrote:

> upstream_version git1234 could be prefixed with epoch 0 and thus lead to
> the version number 0:git1234-debian_revision.  Maybe this could be

Nah. Just drop the leading 'git'.


On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote:

> We have no upstream with such versions currently in Debian. I don't really

We have, mksh version numbers are mangled (see its watch file)
in a defined way. It uses a repacked source as .orig.tar.gz,
but since dpkg’s extraction mechanism doesn’t really care, for
a package with a normal tar.gz upstream this wouldn’t even matter.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
«MyISAM tables -will- get corrupted eventually. This is a fact of life. »
“mysql is about as much database as ms access” – “MSSQL at least descends
from a database” “it's a rebranded SyBase” “MySQL however was born from a
flatfile and went downhill from there” – “at least jetDB doesn’t claim to
be a database”  (#nosec)    ‣‣‣ Please let MySQL and MariaDB finally die!



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to