Am 11.04.2011 01:47, schrieb Guillem Jover: > Hi! > > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 01:03:49 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 10.04.2011 20:48, schrieb Guillem Jover: >>> As I mentioned in bug 612842 [0] (I just resent my reply now which never >>> arrived), I think this patch in itself is a bad idea, so I'd say just drop >>> it. >> >> Afaics, Ludovic is not going to change his mind, regarding this matter. Given >> Guillems' input, I'd also vote for disabling pcscd support completely. > > Oh, but Ludovic did change his mind and uploaded pcsc-lite 1.7.0-1 > (current version being 1.7.2-1) closing 612971, with libpcsclite1 > recommending instead of dependong on pcscd, the same version switched > from hal to libudev but that should not really matter anymore.
Apologies for the mis-information. I should have checked more carefully. > > So, given this I don't really see why pcsc-lite support would need to > be disabled. I guess you mean linking against it dynamically again instead of dlopen Personally I don't use pcscd and it's still a recommends so another daemon will be pulled in automatically when installing network-manager resp. wpasupplicant, which isn't so nice given the majority of users most likely will not use it. I checked the current pcscd package, and it doesn't seem to start by default *), so I don't understand why the library package has a recommends and not a suggests. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me tbh. Michael *) I has an "exit 0" in its init script which I think is rather questionable way of disabling a service from not being started on boot. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
