-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-04-10 01:02, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > Hi ! > > On 09/04/11 23:01, Niels Thykier wrote: >>> I've just been hit by a problem with respect to the sequencing in >>> dh: >> >>> insert_after("jh_installlibs", "jh_classpath"); >>> insert_after("jh_classpath", "jh_manifest"); >> >> Actually this was a deliberate choice, but we failed to convert cdbs to >> this as well (see the 0.32 changelog entry). I will reorder the cdbs >> sequence to match the DH one with the next upload. > > OK. Then please, update the examples in the tutorial to show that you > can't use something like > > build/stuff.jar my classpath > > but you should use > > usr/share/java/stuff.jar my classpath ? > > (Did I actually get you right here) ? > > That would be very helpful, or, put it another way, not doing it would > be misleading at best :-)... >
Certainly :) >> If you use the package files (debian/<pkg>.jlibs) then you can skip the >> debian/<pkg> part and you do not have to include the version either, >> since jh_manifest/jh_classpath are able to update manifests via a symlink. I noticed that jh_classpath failed to add the debian/$p, so jh_classpath is mostly broken in 0.32 - but apparently no one uses it with the dh sequence since we do not have any RC bugs on it... fun. >> I am not sure how jh_manifest handled it before 0.32, but I rewrote it >> in perl, I made sure it worked correctly if it was passed a symlink (and >> jh_classpath uses jh_manifest). >> >> NB: The dependencies do not change in this case. > > I'm unsure what you mean by that... as fortunately jh_depends is run > after the manifest-tweaking jh_... the depends substvar should be updated ? > Come to think of it... I am not even sure what I meant with the last sentence any more either. >> I would also very much like to see greater adoption of javahelper >> through the java packages. Particularly if we get the Java Library >> Transition part implemented (debated at DebConf10 and on list). > > For that you'll first need that classpath do reflect the actual > dependencies, which I'm afraid is quite wrong (see our exchange on bug > #620829). But I'm ready to invest some time to get that right. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > :) ~Niels -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNqVWfAAoJEAVLu599gGRCktAQAJ/1fe21kwVnBb3wZEaVL6Fv bRHvB9eYcrPgbbvMqBjqHXdIhtnDPLzd/8do62jA3zX4HWRATE4UlonCHx6uXXIu alIzI8sDITglJ3JRNIW4oN/XYztmzXtFp68NKzJQ4b4lDR6k140/pkt3R6zj1Ue3 wwPmuHBqigpmwYXAy0MeEVZJLAy4dDGi+kW4D8EJYBVSYEoBOMnG16OPvWnJki+l T7XgyMAktrVYPxZkGDirRXh/WyRKPwKv3T4dyu7ZXjmI0hj2EjJonfFj12M9mOuS zbg0cnVQeddZ9ZmyBH4XtDIfNeb9+31QLecxgMP+zmSzydw8YfFEGpAXuUaoO8L/ kYgPxu/bakk/XRxgJc0imzL11d7bO8yOSDHIjVg9am2bjIlJteTiFe2FtWiGXQDG l9paJiUbBICeEirgaQwVbJwFvNz7tB3sCzACmFxSe1tsl51+V3touBAeaj2F5VAp mvslBnwkjvXV0GboZBN9ClAYu5UdqkRmmx3BoDJxvit0RAMUR/4ujIo0NPD679oI fSHSeZ+tbiroFRYBoOwjtkdFwcIp6LJ1nE7OdcHlQhoo3r6SVBkM5h2EJjIeyXBZ Faqd4x26VWQYCZYykyQkV9jBjpST+laLwndHx5HrDUZt8G4qOldnMzENWu/+amIM fs2Kj3ESc/v+ykqY17yW =5ubM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org