On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 02:25:11AM +0200, Martin Weiser wrote: > I upgraded to Squeeze (with ImageJ from Sid, ver. 1.45e-1), but it did not > make things better (neither did Squeeze's original version). > Any other idea how to solve this?
No. I do not have any idea at all. There are no other reports like this about problems with imagej. I'm testing every package before I upload it and never have observed a problem like this. For sure that's no reason - but I have just no idea what to try next. > Around me there are some Windows machines and ImageJ seems to run smoothly :-) > I have not anything else with Debian, but I may try it on other machines > with Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat or SuseLinuxEnterpriseDesktop 11 > if that could help find the solution of the problem. Shall I do it? Ubuntu is usually featuring the same packages as Debian (hopefully). Trying under Ubuntu might be a reasonable idea. > Here is the sample session: > > louskacek@zouzel:~$ imagej > Open other images in this ImageJ panel as follows: > imagej -p 1 <image1> [<image2> ... <imageN>] > > #guess what happens here :-) > #yes, you are right, the main panel appears and disappears > #with this version it is faster than before :-) > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException > at java.awt.Component.setDropTarget(libgcj.so.10) > at ij.plugin.DragAndDrop.run(DragAndDrop.java:28) > at ij.IJ.runPlugIn(IJ.java:156) > at ij.IJ.runPlugIn(IJ.java:139) > at ij.ImageJ.<init>(ImageJ.java:196) > at ij.ImageJ.main(ImageJ.java:588) Could you try sending this problem report to upstream ImageJ? This would be probably more easy as if I would work as proxy inbetween. Please make sure you keep the bug report in CC. Good luck Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org