found 323857 1.3+cvs20050222-1 tags 323857 + testing thanks Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:21:13PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: >> Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > I've only had this reported to me with sawfish and I can't reproduce it >> > with kwin so I think this is a sawfish bug. (i.e. if I do pkill xfwm4 >> > && (kwin || xfwm4) & the bug does not occur). >> Reproducible under i386 ? > > No idea. I tested with kwin on i386 not with sawfish. Should be tested with sawfish on i386. [...] >> Nobody is able to find what is exactly wrong with GCC, so do what you >> want. Personally I'll do nothing. Simply wait for a fixed GCC 4. > > Christian, Have you tried a sawfish build with -fno-strict-aliasing for > amd64 only? All archs are built with -fno-strict-aliasing to solve bug #317817. But this bug has been filed against 1.3+cvs20050222-1 the testing package whom is not build with -fno-strict-aliasing. Paul could you try the unstable package ? Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
