On Sun, 08 May 2011, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: > Ok, that makes sense. I was (most likely incorrectly) under the > impression that the names (package and library file) had to be the > same, since I previously got a lintian warning about this (before I > included the 4-0 in libtrng4-0).
Well, I was looking at the package name in the ITP, which was "trng". libtrng is not that bad for a binary package, mostly because the lib itself will be called libtrng, anyway. I must ask something else: we usually do not package libraries unless we will also have binary packages that depend on them, or they have a _large_ userbase outside of the distro. Do any of those conditions apply? > However, I'll read up here regarding package names: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html > > Anyway, if I change the package name, would I need to report a > second ITP with a different package name, or can an upload of a > renamed package close this particular ITP? No need to file a second ITP or retitle the ITP bug. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
