Sven Joachim dixit:
>On 2011-05-13 11:21 +0200, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
>> There are no old entries. The new cvs package is not
>> derived from the old package.
>
>How is that possible, given that it's still the same .orig tarball
No, it’s not: the new .orig.tar.gz is the actual upstream tarball.
>You may have done the Debian packaging from scratch, but I don't think
>this is sufficient reason to destroy the package's history.
The debian/changelog file documents the changes to the
Debian packaging. Upstream changelogs are installed as
well. I said I will _replace_ Debian’s old CVS package
with mine when I offered to take it over, and so I did
so there is nothing to “keep” since it was never there
(in fact, my CVS package was created due to the short-
comings of the old one). This is final.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
If Harry Potter gets a splitting headache in his scar
when he’s near Tom Riddle (aka Voldemort),
does Tom get pain in the arse when Harry is near him?
-- me, wondering why it’s not Jerry Potter………
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
