On Thu, 26 May 2011 14:50:50 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> wrote: > I've developed a while ago a tiny teeny script for integrating notmuch with a > Mutt-based workflow. Some rationale for it has been given at > http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2011/01/how_to_use_Notmuch_with_Mutt/
Very cool! I'll have to pass that along to all of my mutt-using friends. > I'm happy using mutt-notmuch locally installed and it's really nothing > fancy. Nonetheless AFAICT (from page accesses and people who ask me about it), > mutt-notmuch seems to be fairly popular. It might hence be worth shipping it > in > a more prominent way, so that others can benefit from it. A standalone package > for it would be totally overkilling, hence I'm bugging here to suggest > shipping > mutt-notmuch as part of the notmuch package. What do you think? I am totally glad to include the script in the notmuch source repository, (maybe under a new "contrib" directory?). Would you feel comfortable with maintaining it there? Then, this script would introduce new dependencies, right? So we should actually package notmuch-mutt separately, but we can do that with the same source package. Could you propose an appropriate section for notmuch/debian/rules for this? Thanks, -Carl PS. We should also similarly split off notmuch-emacs from the main notmuch package---but that's an independent issue. -- carl.d.wo...@intel.com
pgp6JXAJNBQmg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
